CEG
CEG
Constellation Energy Corporation (CEG) is the largest producer of carbon-free energy in the United States, operating the nation's largest nuclear fleet with nearly 19 GW of capacity across 14 nuclear plants and 21 reactors. The company serves approximately 2 million customers across the Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, New York, and Texas (ERCOT) regions.
In September 2024, Constellation signed a landmark 20-year Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with Microsoft to restart Three Mile Island Unit 1 — renamed the Crane Clean Energy Center — providing 835 MW of dedicated baseload nuclear power for Microsoft's AI data center operations. This deal represents the largest PPA in Constellation's history and validates the emerging nuclear-for-AI thesis.
The company generates virtually 100% clean energy from nuclear, wind, solar, and hydro assets, positioning it as the premier provider of 24/7 firm clean power to hyperscalers and data center operators who require round-the-clock baseload electricity that intermittent renewables cannot provide.
| Business Segment | Revenue | % of Total | YoY Growth | Margin | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mid-Atlantic | $8,300M | 33% | +10.0% | 22.0% | Largest region; includes TMI restart |
| Midwest | $7,100M | 28% | +6.0% | 19.0% | Stable regulated & competitive markets |
| New York | $4,500M | 18% | +5.0% | 17.0% | FitzPatrick & Nine Mile Point nuclear |
| ERCOT & Other | $3,700M | 14% | +15.0% | 13.0% | Texas growth market; higher volatility |
| Corporate & Other | $1,933M | 7% | +3.0% | -2.0% | Intersegment eliminations, hedging |
| Blended Growth Rate | — | 100% | +8.2% | — | Weighted avg across segments |
Startup
Hyper Growth
Self Funding
Operating Leverage
Capital Return
Decline
Stage 4 — Operating Leverage: Revenue growing modestly with profits inflecting rapidly. The classic DCF sweet spot — FCF is reliable, growing, and well-anchored to analyst estimates.
Why this drives model selection: Classic DCF sweet spot — FCF inflecting and growing rapidly.
| Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| ROIC | 6.5% | <8% weak |
| FCF Margin | 11.8% | ≥10% strong |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.6x | ≤2x conservative |
| Revenue Trend | Growing 3yr | 3-year directional trend |
| FCF Margin Trend | Expanding | Directional margin trajectory |
| Analyst Revisions | Upward revisions | Last 90 days consensus direction |
| Metric | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue ($M) | $24,440 | $24,918 | $23,568 | $25,533 |
| Rev YoY Growth | — | +2.0% | -5.4% | +8.3% |
| Gross Margin | 8.7% | 13.0% | 25.4% | 18.4% |
| EBITDA ($M) | $2,922 | $4,124 | $7,052 | $5,687 |
| EBITDA Margin | 12.0% | 16.6% | 29.9% | 22.3% |
| Operating Income ($M) | $495 | $1,610 | $4,352 | $3,086 |
| Operating Margin | 2.0% | 6.5% | 18.5% | 12.1% |
| Net Income ($M) | $-160 | $1,623 | $3,749 | $2,319 |
| Net Margin | -0.7% | 6.5% | 15.9% | 9.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.49 | $5.01 | $11.89 | $7.40 |
| Free Cash Flow ($M) | $-4,042 | $-7,723 | $-5,029 | $1,288 |
| Annual DPS | $0.564 | $1.128 | $1.410 | $1.551 |
| Total Debt ($M) | $5,768 | $9,261 | $8,412 | $8,992 |
| Year | Diluted Shares (M) | YoY Change | Buyback Spend ($M) | Buyback Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 329.0M | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 324.0M | -1.5% | $300 | 0.3% |
| 2024 | 315.0M | -2.8% | $800 | 0.8% |
| 2025 | 312.4M | -0.8% | $600 | 0.6% |
Constellation has been steadily reducing shares outstanding — from 329M in 2022 to 312M in 2025, a 5.2% reduction. The company targets $1B+ in annual share repurchases. Combined with a growing dividend ($1.551/share FY2025, ~0.50% yield), total shareholder return is attractive. The low dividend yield reflects the growth-oriented capital allocation: prioritizing buybacks and nuclear reinvestment over high payouts.
| Input | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Risk-Free Rate (Rf) | 4.25% | 10-yr US Treasury yield |
| Beta (β) | 0.800 | Market beta (Finnhub) |
| Equity Risk Premium (ERP) | 5.5% | Damodaran US ERP |
| Cost of Equity (Ke) | 8.65% | Ke = Rf + β × ERP |
| Pre-Tax Cost of Debt | 5.10% | Interest exp / gross debt |
| After-Tax Cost of Debt (Kd) | 3.82% | × (1 − 25%) |
| Weight Equity (We) | 91.5% | Mkt cap $0.0B |
| Weight Debt (Wd) | 8.5% | Gross debt $0.0B |
| WACC | 7.50% | DCF discount rate |
| Scenario | Stage 1 (Yrs 1–5) | Stage 2 (Yrs 6–10) | Terminal g | WACC | Intrinsic Value | vs Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🔴 Bear | 5.0% | 3.0% | 2.5% | 7.50% | $203 | ▼34.8% |
| 📊 Base | 10.0% | 6.0% | 3.0% | 7.50% | $308 | ▼1.0% |
| 🚀 Bull | 15.0% | 8.0% | 3.5% | 7.50% | $494 | ▲58.8% |
| Period | Stage | FCFF | PV of FCFF | Cumulative EV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 ✦ | Stage 1 | $3.15B | $2.93B | $2.93B |
| Year 2 ✦ | Stage 1 | $3.30B | $2.86B | $5.79B |
| Year 3 ✦ | Stage 1 | $3.45B | $2.78B | $8.56B |
| Year 4 ✦ | Stage 1 | $3.60B | $2.70B | $11.26B |
| Year 5 ✦ | Stage 1 | $3.75B | $2.61B | $13.87B |
| Year 6 | Stage 2 | $3.86B | $2.50B | $16.37B |
| Year 7 | Stage 2 | $3.98B | $2.40B | $18.77B |
| Year 8 | Stage 2 | $4.10B | $2.30B | $21.07B |
| Year 9 | Stage 2 | $4.22B | $2.20B | $23.27B |
| Year 10 | Stage 2 | $4.35B | $2.11B | $25.38B |
| Terminal | — | TV=$89.1B | PV(TV)=$43.2B (63% of EV) | EV=$68.6B |
| Intrinsic Value | — | — | EV $68.6B − Net Debt → Equity / Shares | $203 |
| Period | Stage | FCFF | PV of FCFF | Cumulative EV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 ✦ | Stage 1 | $3.30B | $3.07B | $3.07B |
| Year 2 ✦ | Stage 1 | $3.65B | $3.16B | $6.23B |
| Year 3 ✦ | Stage 1 | $4.00B | $3.22B | $9.45B |
| Year 4 ✦ | Stage 1 | $4.35B | $3.26B | $12.71B |
| Year 5 ✦ | Stage 1 | $4.70B | $3.27B | $15.98B |
| Year 6 | Stage 2 | $4.98B | $3.23B | $19.21B |
| Year 7 | Stage 2 | $5.28B | $3.18B | $22.39B |
| Year 8 | Stage 2 | $5.60B | $3.14B | $25.53B |
| Year 9 | Stage 2 | $5.93B | $3.09B | $28.62B |
| Year 10 | Stage 2 | $6.29B | $3.05B | $31.68B |
| Terminal | — | TV=$144.0B | PV(TV)=$69.9B (69% of EV) | EV=$101.5B |
| Intrinsic Value | — | — | EV $101.5B − Net Debt → Equity / Shares | $308 |
| Period | Stage | FCFF | PV of FCFF | Cumulative EV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 ✦ | Stage 1 | $3.45B | $3.21B | $3.21B |
| Year 2 ✦ | Stage 1 | $4.00B | $3.46B | $6.67B |
| Year 3 ✦ | Stage 1 | $4.70B | $3.78B | $10.45B |
| Year 4 ✦ | Stage 1 | $5.50B | $4.12B | $14.57B |
| Year 5 ✦ | Stage 1 | $6.40B | $4.46B | $19.03B |
| Year 6 | Stage 2 | $6.91B | $4.48B | $23.51B |
| Year 7 | Stage 2 | $7.46B | $4.50B | $28.01B |
| Year 8 | Stage 2 | $8.06B | $4.52B | $32.53B |
| Year 9 | Stage 2 | $8.71B | $4.54B | $37.07B |
| Year 10 | Stage 2 | $9.40B | $4.56B | $41.63B |
| Terminal | — | TV=$243.3B | PV(TV)=$118.1B (74% of EV) | EV=$159.7B |
| Intrinsic Value | — | — | EV $159.7B − Net Debt → Equity / Shares | $494 |
| WACC \ gT | 1.5% | 2.0% | 2.5% | 3.0% | 3.5% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.5% | $405 | $451 | $512 | $597 | $725 |
| 6.0% | $355 | $389 | $433 | $492 | $573 |
| 6.5% | $316 | $342 | $374 | $416 | $472 |
| 7.0% | $283 | $304 | $329 | $360 | $400 |
| 7.5% | $256 | $273 | $292 | $316 | $346 |
| 8.0% | $233 | $247 | $262 | $281 | $304 |
| 8.5% | $214 | $225 | $238 | $253 | $271 |
| 9.0% | $197 | $206 | $217 | $229 | $243 |
| 9.5% | $182 | $190 | $199 | $209 | $221 |
Green = >10% above current price. Red = >10% below. Gold = within ±10%.
| Year | Low / Actual | Avg | High | # Analysts | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | $-0.49 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2023 | $5.01 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2024 | $11.89 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2025 | $7.40 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2026 | $10.00 | $11.63 | $12.83 | 25 | Estimate |
| 2027 | $11.56 | $13.51 | $15.79 | 25 | Estimate |
| Year | Low / Actual | Avg | High | # Analysts | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | $24.4B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2023 | $24.9B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2024 | $23.6B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2025 | $25.5B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2026 | $20.1B | $30.7B | $41.0B | 25 | Estimate |
| 2027 | $22.1B | $33.0B | $44.6B | 25 | Estimate |
| Analyst | Firm | Rating | PT | Upside |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew Weisel | Scotiabank | Buy | $441 | +41.7% |
| Shelby Tucker | TD Cowen | Strong Buy | $381 | +22.4% |
| David Arcaro | Morgan Stanley | Buy | $360 | +15.7% |
| Nicholas Campanella | Barclays | Buy | $358 | +15.0% |
- AI data center power demand catalyst: Hyperscalers (Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Meta) are racing to secure baseload clean power for AI training and inference workloads. Nuclear is the only 24/7 zero-carbon option at scale — Constellation controls the largest fleet.
- Three Mile Island restart (Crane Clean Energy Center): $1.6B investment to restart 835 MW, fully contracted under a 20-year PPA with Microsoft at premium pricing. Revenue contribution expected from 2028.
- Operating leverage inflecting: Normalized FCF of ~$3B reflects mid-cycle earnings power after TMI capex normalizes. Nuclear operating costs are largely fixed, so incremental MW sold at premium PPA rates flows directly to the bottom line.
- Regulatory tailwind: Inflation Reduction Act provides nuclear production tax credits ($15/MWh), which Constellation can monetize. States increasingly value nuclear as clean baseload for grid reliability.
- Scarcity value of nuclear capacity: No new nuclear plants are being built in the US. Existing nuclear capacity is becoming a scarce, high-value asset as data center power demand grows 15-25% annually.
As Senior Vice President of Strategy, Corporate Affairs and Advocacy, Emily Duncan leads Constellation’s enterprise strategy and integrated external engagement including communications, marketing and philanthropy. ... Daniel L. Eggers · As
Mr. de Balmann has extensive experience in corporate finance, including the derivatives and capital markets as well as industry experience as a director of Constellation Energy Group from 2003 to 2012.
Constellation Energy's CEO is Joe Dominguez, appointed in Oct 2021, has a tenure of 4.42 years. total yearly compensation is $17.12M, comprised of 8.7% salary and 91.3% bonuses, including company stock and options. dir
- good pay
- recommend
- poor management
- toxic
Sep 16, 2025 · Armed security officer · Former employee, more than 1 year · Clinton, IL · Recommend · CEO approval · Business Outlook · Pros · - Great Pay - 12 Hour shifts and 4/3 day work weeks (They invert) - Low work - Very understanding
"•Culture within engineering is great." "Good Salary and bonus." Users say... "Poor management" "long hours but easily manageable" "Communication to lower tiers is poor." &q
Oct 1, 2025 · Engineer · Current employee · Recommend · CEO approval · Business Outlook · Pros · Good Pay Good Manager Overall Good · Cons · Location of every workplace not very good, must know before starting. Show more · Constellation Ene
| Tier | Price | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — Starter | ≤$284 | Begin position |
| Tier 2 — Add | ≤$256 | Add on weakness |
| Tier 3 — Full | ≤$193 | Full allocation |
| Sell Alert | ≥$420 | Above fair value — consider trimming |
Verdict: Accumulate. Constellation Energy is the premier nuclear-for-AI play — the largest operator of carbon-free baseload power in the US at a time when hyperscalers are desperate for 24/7 clean electricity. Our DCF base case fair value of $308/share suggests meaningful upside from the current $311. The bull case at $494 reflects the full AI power demand thesis. The stock trades at a premium to traditional utilities, but the AI data center power demand thesis and nuclear capacity scarcity justifies a higher multiple. The Microsoft PPA for TMI restart validates the model, but execution risk remains. Accumulate on weakness below Tier 1 entry; the long-term thesis is compelling.
| Assumption | Rationale / Notes |
|---|---|
| Normalized FCF Base | FY2025 reported FCF of $1,288M is depressed by ~$1.6B in TMI restart capex and working capital timing. We use a normalized $3,000M base to reflect mid-cycle earnings power after the TMI investment normalizes (expected 2027+). This is supported by EBITDA of $5.7B and maintenance capex of ~$1.5-2B, implying sustainable FCF of $3B+. |
| WACC Calibration (7.5%) | We use 7.5% WACC, below the pure CAPM estimate of 8.25%. Constellation's 20-year contracted PPA with Microsoft and regulated rate base provide bond-like revenue visibility with significantly less volatility than the market assumes. The contracted revenue profile supports a lower discount rate. |
| DCF vs Analyst PT Gap | Our base IV of $308 is below the analyst consensus PT of $380.60. This gap reflects the nuclear scarcity premium: existing nuclear capacity cannot be replicated on any reasonable timeline, and the AI data center demand thesis gives Constellation pricing power that a standard DCF does not fully capture. The bull case of $494 better reflects this premium. |
| AI Data Center Premium | The base case growth of 10% Stage 1 / 6% Stage 2 already incorporates a premium above utility-sector averages (2-4%). This reflects the structural demand shift from AI data centers needing 24/7 clean baseload power. The bull case at 15%/8% assumes multiple hyperscaler PPAs at premium pricing. |
| TMI Restart (Crane Clean Energy Center) | The $1.6B investment to restart Three Mile Island Unit 1 is expected to generate 835 MW of dedicated baseload power under a 20-year PPA with Microsoft. Revenue contribution expected from 2028, with incremental FCF of $300-500M annually once operational. |