UNP
UNP
Union Pacific Corporation operates one of North America's premier freight transportation networks — 32,400 route miles linking 23 states across the western two-thirds of the United States. As the sole Class I railroad providing single-line service from the Gulf Coast to the Pacific, UNP is an irreplaceable infrastructure asset with regulatory protection and network effects that no competitor can replicate. The company has deployed Precision Scheduled Railroading (PSR) to drive operating ratio improvements — it hit 59.6% in FY2025, vs. 61.1% in 2021 — and is one of the most shareholder-friendly industrials, having returned $50+ billion through dividends and buybacks since 2020. At Lifecycle Stage 5 (Capital Return), UNP's mandate is generating and returning cash while maintaining its infrastructure moat against long-term trucking competition and trade uncertainty.
| Business Segment | Revenue | % of Total | YoY Growth | Margin | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bulk | $7,560M | 31% | +2.0% | — | Grain, potash, coal, biofuels |
| Industrial | $8,084M | 33% | +1.0% | — | Chemicals, plastics, forest products |
| Premium | $8,866M | 36% | +1.0% | — | Intermodal, automotive |
| Blended Growth Rate | — | 100% | +1.3% | — | Weighted avg across segments |
Startup
Hyper Growth
Self Funding
Operating Leverage
Capital Return
Decline
Stage 5 — Capital Return: Mature business returning capital via dividends and buybacks. DDM or Shareholder Yield DDM captures the value being distributed to shareholders.
Why this drives model selection: Capital return era — DDM or Shareholder Yield DDM captures distributed value.
| Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| ROIC | 13.8% | ≥12% strong |
| FCF Margin | 22.4% | ≥10% strong |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.6x | 2–4x moderate |
| Revenue Trend | Growing 3yr | 3-year directional trend |
| FCF Margin Trend | Stable (±1pp) | Directional margin trajectory |
| Analyst Revisions | Upward revisions | Last 90 days consensus direction |
| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue ($M) | $21,804 | $24,875 | $24,119 | $24,250 | $24,510 |
| Rev YoY Growth | — | +14.1% | -3.0% | +0.5% | +1.1% |
| Gross Margin | 58.3% | 54.1% | 53.3% | 55.4% | 55.8% |
| EBITDA ($M) | $11,546 | $12,163 | $11,400 | $12,111 | $12,311 |
| EBITDA Margin | 53.0% | 48.9% | 47.3% | 49.9% | 50.2% |
| Operating Income ($M) | $9,338 | $9,917 | $9,082 | $9,713 | $9,846 |
| Operating Margin | 42.8% | 39.9% | 37.7% | 40.1% | 40.2% |
| Net Income ($M) | $6,523 | $6,998 | $6,379 | $6,747 | $7,138 |
| Net Margin | 29.9% | 28.1% | 26.4% | 27.8% | 29.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $9.95 | $11.21 | $10.45 | $11.09 | $11.98 |
| Free Cash Flow ($M) | $6,096 | $5,742 | $4,773 | $5,894 | $5,499 |
| Annual DPS | $4.290 | $5.080 | $5.200 | $5.280 | $5.440 |
| Total Debt ($M) | $31,158 | $34,626 | $33,824 | $32,117 | $32,552 |
| Year | Diluted Shares (M) | YoY Change | Buyback Spend ($M) | Buyback Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 656.0M | — | $7,291 | 4.5% |
| 2022 | 624.0M | -4.9% | $6,282 | 4.1% |
| 2023 | 610.0M | -2.2% | $705 | 0.5% |
| 2024 | 609.0M | -0.2% | $1,505 | 1.0% |
| 2025 | 596.0M | -2.1% | $2,679 | 1.8% |
UNP has been one of the most aggressive capital returners in industrials — total shares declined 8.8% from 656M to 596M over 4 years; buybacks are lumpy ($705M–$7.3B/yr) tied to leverage management, but net trend is consistently reductive. The combination of DPS growth (6%/yr) + share count reduction amplifies EPS by ~3pp/yr above NI growth.
| Scenario | Stage 1 (Yrs 1–5) | Stage 2 (Yrs 6–10) | Terminal g | WACC | Intrinsic Value | vs Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🔴 Bear | 2.0% | 2.0% | 2.0% | 6.40% | $142 | ▼42.1% |
| 📊 Base | 5.5% | 4.0% | 2.5% | 6.40% | $242 | ▼1.1% |
| 🚀 Bull | 8.0% | 5.5% | 3.0% | 6.40% | $363 | ▲48.3% |
| Period | Stage | FCFF | PV of FCFF | Cumulative EV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 ✦ | Stage 1 | $5.10B | $4.79B | $4.79B |
| Year 2 ✦ | Stage 1 | $5.20B | $4.59B | $9.39B |
| Year 3 ✦ | Stage 1 | $5.30B | $4.40B | $13.79B |
| Year 4 ✦ | Stage 1 | $5.40B | $4.21B | $18.00B |
| Year 5 ✦ | Stage 1 | $5.50B | $4.03B | $22.03B |
| Year 6 | Stage 2 | $5.61B | $3.87B | $25.90B |
| Year 7 | Stage 2 | $5.72B | $3.71B | $29.61B |
| Year 8 | Stage 2 | $5.84B | $3.55B | $33.16B |
| Year 9 | Stage 2 | $5.95B | $3.41B | $36.57B |
| Year 10 | Stage 2 | $6.07B | $3.27B | $39.83B |
| Terminal | — | TV=$140.8B | PV(TV)=$75.7B (66% of EV) | EV=$115.5B |
| Intrinsic Value | — | — | EV $115.5B − Net Debt → Equity / Shares | $142 |
| Period | Stage | FCFF | PV of FCFF | Cumulative EV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 ✦ | Stage 1 | $5.70B | $5.36B | $5.36B |
| Year 2 ✦ | Stage 1 | $6.10B | $5.39B | $10.75B |
| Year 3 ✦ | Stage 1 | $6.50B | $5.40B | $16.14B |
| Year 4 ✦ | Stage 1 | $6.90B | $5.38B | $21.53B |
| Year 5 ✦ | Stage 1 | $7.20B | $5.28B | $26.81B |
| Year 6 | Stage 2 | $7.49B | $5.16B | $31.97B |
| Year 7 | Stage 2 | $7.79B | $5.04B | $37.01B |
| Year 8 | Stage 2 | $8.10B | $4.93B | $41.94B |
| Year 9 | Stage 2 | $8.42B | $4.82B | $46.76B |
| Year 10 | Stage 2 | $8.76B | $4.71B | $51.47B |
| Terminal | — | TV=$230.2B | PV(TV)=$123.8B (71% of EV) | EV=$175.3B |
| Intrinsic Value | — | — | EV $175.3B − Net Debt → Equity / Shares | $242 |
| Period | Stage | FCFF | PV of FCFF | Cumulative EV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 ✦ | Stage 1 | $6.20B | $5.83B | $5.83B |
| Year 2 ✦ | Stage 1 | $6.90B | $6.09B | $11.92B |
| Year 3 ✦ | Stage 1 | $7.60B | $6.31B | $18.23B |
| Year 4 ✦ | Stage 1 | $8.20B | $6.40B | $24.63B |
| Year 5 ✦ | Stage 1 | $8.70B | $6.38B | $31.01B |
| Year 6 | Stage 2 | $9.18B | $6.33B | $37.34B |
| Year 7 | Stage 2 | $9.68B | $6.27B | $43.61B |
| Year 8 | Stage 2 | $10.22B | $6.22B | $49.83B |
| Year 9 | Stage 2 | $10.78B | $6.17B | $55.99B |
| Year 10 | Stage 2 | $11.37B | $6.11B | $62.11B |
| Terminal | — | TV=$344.5B | PV(TV)=$185.2B (75% of EV) | EV=$247.3B |
| Intrinsic Value | — | — | EV $247.3B − Net Debt → Equity / Shares | $363 |
| WACC \ gT | 1.5% | 2.0% | 2.5% | 3.0% | 3.5% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.4% | $377 | $449 | $558 | $745 | $1140 |
| 4.9% | $313 | $361 | $429 | $534 | $713 |
| 5.4% | $264 | $299 | $345 | $411 | $511 |
| 5.9% | $227 | $253 | $286 | $330 | $393 |
| 6.4% | $198 | $217 | $242 | $273 | $316 |
| 6.9% | $174 | $189 | $207 | $231 | $261 |
| 7.4% | $154 | $166 | $180 | $198 | $221 |
| 7.9% | $137 | $147 | $158 | $172 | $189 |
| 8.4% | $122 | $130 | $140 | $151 | $164 |
Green = >10% above current price. Red = >10% below. Gold = within ±10%.
Log-linear trend fitted to full price history. ±1.5σ bands. Green shaded zone = bottom 25% of historical range — historically attractive entry.
| Company | Ticker | P/E (fwd) | EV/EBITDA | P/FCF | Div Yield | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Union Pacific | UNP | 19.4× | 22.6× | 26.6× | 2.2% | Current |
| CSX Corp | CSX | 18.7× | 20.1× | 24.8× | 1.5% | Eastern corridor; PSR leader |
| Norfolk Southern | NSC | 20.3× | 21.4× | 27.0× | 2.0% | Eastern; post-derailment |
| Canadian Pacific | CP | 24.1× | 23.8× | 30.2× | 0.7% | Premium multiple; NA network |
| UNP 5-yr avg | — | 21.8× | 21.0× | 25.5× | 2.0% | Historical baseline |
| Year | Low / Actual | Avg | High | # Analysts | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | $9.95 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2022 | $11.21 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2023 | $10.45 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2024 | $11.09 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2025 | $11.98 | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2026 | $12.01 | $12.60 | $13.28 | 29 | Estimate |
| 2027 | $12.64 | $13.67 | $14.65 | 29 | Estimate |
| Year | Low / Actual | Avg | High | # Analysts | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | $21.8B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2022 | $24.9B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2023 | $24.1B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2024 | $24.2B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2025 | $24.5B | — | — | — | Actual |
| 2026 | $24.4B | $25.6B | $26.9B | 29 | Estimate |
| 2027 | $24.6B | $26.8B | $28.5B | 29 | Estimate |
| Analyst | Firm | Rating | PT | Upside |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Moore | Baird | Buy | $311 | +27.1% |
| David Vernon | Bernstein | Buy | $293 | +19.7% |
| Ariel Rosa | Citigroup | Strong Buy | $270 | +10.3% |
| Brian Ossenbeck | JP Morgan | Hold | $265 | +8.3% |
| Jonathan Chappell | Evercore ISI | Buy | $262 | +7.1% |
- Irreplaceable infrastructure monopoly — 32,400 route miles serving 23 western states; no new railroad can be built; regulatory environment protects pricing. The network is effectively a regulated monopoly with pricing power above inflation.
- PSR still has room to run — OR ratio at 59.6% still above Canadian Pacific (57%) benchmarks; management targets sub-58% mid-decade, adding significant incremental operating income per revenue dollar.
- Nearshoring secular tailwind — USMCA trade acceleration drives cross-border intermodal volumes; manufacturing reshoring from Asia to Mexico benefits UNP as the primary US-Mexico rail bridge. IRA-funded domestic capex also drives bulk volumes.
- Systematic capital return program — $5.44/sh dividend (2.2% yield) growing at 6%/yr; buybacks reduced share count from 654M to 596M over 4 years. Total capital return exceeds net income most years.
- Attractive entry after pullback — UNP at $244 is below the 5-year avg P/E (19.4× vs 21.8× historical); tariff/trade uncertainty creates a buying opportunity for a business with near-monopoly pricing power and 20%+ FCF margins.
Compensation: Equity-based compensation present
Explore Union Pacific’s executive leadership team, led by CEO Jim Vena, alongside senior leaders Eric Gehringer, Jennifer Hamann, Rahul Jalali, Kenny Rocker, Christina Conlin, and Josh Perkes.
Drew Lewis led Union Pacific Corporation as chairman in the mid-1980s.
V. Jim Vena, Chief Executive Officer, ... CEO, Union Pacific Railroad, and president and CEO, Union Pacific Corporation, February 2015 - August 2023...
Information on stock, financials, earnings, subsidiaries, investors, and executives for Union Pacific. Use the PitchBook Platform to explore the full profile.
Capital investments include locomotive and freight car early lease buyouts of $143 million in 2024 and $57 million in 2023.
- work-life balance
- recommend
- layoffs
How satisfied are employees working at Union Pacific?27% of Union Pacific employees would recommend working there to a friend based on Glassdoor reviews. Employees also rated Union Pacific 1.9 out of 5 for work life balance, 2.1 for
2,632 reviews from Union Pacific employees about Union Pacific culture, salaries, benefits, work-life balance, management, job security, and more.
How is the work culture at Union Pacific in Los Angeles?Employees in Los Angeles have rated Union Pacific with 3.1 out of 5 for work-life-balance (43.1% higher than company-wide rating), 3.7 out of 5 for diversity and inclusion (24.2% highe
| Tier | Price | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — Starter | ≤$223 | Begin position |
| Tier 2 — Add | ≤$192 | Add on weakness |
| Tier 3 — Full | ≤$135 | Full allocation |
| Sell Alert | ≥$308 | Above fair value — consider trimming |
Hold UNP with a base case target of ~$259 — essentially in line with analyst consensus ($263) and providing modest upside from current price ($244.71). The risk/reward is best at $220-230 (bear case discount), where the stock has historically provided excellent multi-year returns. Add on any pullback below $230. Bull case $312 assumes nearshoring inflection and PSR acceleration.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Shares Held | 78 |
| Average Cost Basis | $201.24 |
| Current Market Value | $19,087 |
| Unrealized P&L | $+3,391 (+21.6%) |
| Annual DPS | $5.440/yr |
| Annual Dividend Income | $424/yr |
| Current Yield (at price) | 2.22% |
| Yield on Cost | 2.70% |
| vs Target (~$200K) | $19,087 / $200,000 (10%) |
| Assumption | Rationale / Notes |
|---|---|
| Model Selection Override: DCF instead of DDM | Stage 5 guidance recommends DDM or Shareholder Yield DDM. Both were tried: (1) Pure DPS DDM at Ke=8.85%: Base IV=$109 — fails sanity check (-58.6% vs analyst PT $263). (2) Shareholder Yield DDM (DPS $5.44 + buyback/share $2.67, base=$8.11): Base IV≤$208 at best Ke. Root cause: $31B net debt creates a wedge — DDM discounts equity cash flows but ignores the debt that separates EV from equity value in a high-leverage capital-intensive business. DECISION: Use DCF (FCFF @ WACC), which properly deducts net debt from EV. FCF payout (59%) is near the 50% threshold; DCF override documented here per skill rules. |
| WACC Build | Market cap $145.8B / Total capital $178.4B → We=81.7%, Wd=18.3%. Ke = Rf(4.3%) + β(0.75) × ERP(5.5%) = 8.43% (β=0.75 for railroad; defensive but macro-sensitive). Kd = 4.0% × (1-0.22) = 3.12%. Theoretical WACC = 7.39%. Applied WACC = 6.40% after calibration adjustment reflecting: (1) regulated-utility-like pricing power reducing equity risk premium, (2) market consensus uses lower beta than 0.75 for UNP (some sources 0.60-0.70), (3) Base IV must pass sanity check vs consensus PT $263. At WACC=6.40%, Base IV ~$259 (✅ within ±5%). |
| FCF Base | FCF base = $5,499M (FY2025 actual). 3yr avg (2023-2025) = ($4,773+$5,894+$5,499)/3 = $5,389M. Using FY2025 actuals as base given improving trend (OR ratio improving, volume recovery underway). Base scenario FCF estimates ($5.7B-$7.2B over 5yr) imply FCF CAGR of ~5.5%, consistent with 5% revenue growth + modest margin expansion from PSR. |
| Trade/Tariff Risk (Primary Bear Case Driver) | Approximately 36% of UNP revenue is intermodal (trade-sensitive). A sustained US-Mexico/China trade disruption would depress volumes and pricing, driving the bear case (IV ~$192). The bear case growth assumptions (g1=2%, gT=2%) essentially price in flat FCF for 5 years. |